Tips on Public Speaking: Eliminating the Dreaded "Um"
Steven D. Cohen is an award-winning speaker who teaches The Art and Practice of Public Speaking at Harvard Extension School. An expert on public speaking, Cohen researches and writes about the techniques that professional speakers use to design and deliver powerful messages. For more information, visit www.stevendcohen.net. In this blog post, Cohen explores how filler words can make you, and even the most powerful speakers, look unprofessional.
It is difficult for me to watch political speeches. After all, I know that I am going to hear one alarming word over and over again. It’s not “debt,” “deficit,” or “downturn.” It’s “um.”
Filler words like “um” may seem natural in everyday speech, but they do not belong in formal presentations or speeches. Powerful public speakers work hard to eliminate words such as “um,” “uh,” “well,” “so,” “you know,” “er,” and “like” from their vocabulary so that their listeners can focus solely on their message. Through practice and persistence, you can too.
So, like, why am I saying “um”?
Why do we use filler words? The simplest answer is that we have been conditioned to answer questions immediately from an early age. When our mother or father asked us a question, we were sure to answer right away—either because we wanted to show respect or because we were afraid of what would happen if we didn’t answer. Consequently, we feel the urge to speak when spoken to.
Some people argue that filler words serve an important purpose such as making a speaker sound more “natural” or “real.” In fact, Michael Erard wrote a book on this very subject. But just because filler words are fairly common in everyday speech does not mean that they are useful. In fact, they often detract from the listener’s ability to understand a particular message.
There are two places where filler words commonly appear: at the beginning of a statement and in between ideas. See what happens the next time you answer a question. You might say “um” or “uh” right away without even thinking. Then when you are finished discussing your first idea, you may be tempted to use another filler word as you decide what to say next.
You can think of these two “filler word hot spots” in the context of a two paragraph essay. The first hot spot would be the tab before the first paragraph, and the second hot spot would be the white space between the first and second paragraphs.
When you use a filler word such as “um,” you are thinking verbally. In other words, you are verbalizing your thought process. Armed with this information, it is easy to realize that the best way to avoid using filler words is to pause. If you are not speaking, you can’t say “um”!
Removing “um” from your vocabulary
The next time you are asked a question, take a couple seconds to think about what you want to say. This pause serves two important purposes: it will help you begin powerfully, and it will help you avoid using a filler word. Pause, think, answer.
The same public speaking technique applies when you are transitioning from one idea to another. While you may be tempted to fill the silence between ideas with a filler word, remember to pause and give yourself a moment to think about what you want to say next. It is important that you don’t begin speaking until you are ready. Remember: Pause, think, answer.
It may feel unnatural to pause, especially since you have responded to questions right away for your entire life. I assure you that you will deliver more powerful responses and reduce your chance of using filler words if you give yourself time to think.
Can’t seem to shake the habit? Ask for help.
If you need help overcoming your “um” problem, consider asking a co-worker, family member, or friend to point out when you use filler words. You also could record an upcoming presentation and then watch yourself in action. You may be amazed at how often you say “um” or “uh”!
Although we live in a fast-paced society that seemingly demands instant answers, we must use the pause to our advantage. We may feel pressure to answer right away, but ultimately, we should only speak when we are ready.
Do you agree? I would like to hear what you think so leave a comment. But, please, don’t use any “ums.”





Though not an issue when you're giving a speech in front of an audience, when speaking in a group setting (think work meeting) there is often a level of "competition" for the chance to talk. A pause when speaking often gives someone else the opportunity to pounce and take over the role of speaker. A filler word signals others that you're not yet done talking.
October 31, 2012 at 1:50pm.When I was growing up, my best friend Amy used the filler "um-ma" quite frequently. Annoyed, her mom enlisted my friend's entire family in softly saying "ding" every time Amy said "um-ma" to make Amy aware of when she said it. Needless to say, it only took a couple of days for Amy to expunge "um-ma" from her vocabulary!
October 28, 2012 at 5:26pm.I agree with "um" and "uh" as fillers, but would like to offer up another filler. It appears when speakers are asked to answer a question, they often use "that's a good question" as a filler--while they think and decide on what and how to respond. I was taught that no question asked in the interest of learning information is ever a "bad" question, so why would any of the "talking-heads" ever have to qualify the question before their answer unless filling time while searching for an appropriate response.
October 28, 2012 at 12:15pm.Insightful. I will try it the next time I get asked a question! The use of "so..." in Minnesota is a transitional phrase that reemphasizes what one has just said. It is so annoying and I do it all the time! I believe that it comes from our Scandinavian heritage as I hear it linger after phrases in that language as well. Anyway, it is a bad habit. I'll see if the awareness of "um" helps me with .......so....... Thanks. Tusen Tak.
October 26, 2012 at 3:33pm.I appreciate being mentioned in this blog post. You say, "But just because filler words are fairly common in everyday speech does not mean that they are useful. In fact, they often detract from the listener’s ability to understand a particular message." Readers might find the chapter in my book on the history of umlessness clarifying on this: the detraction that you are referring to is less a matter of psycholinguistic reality than historically-based performance requirements of certain communication genres. And I would pose this question: why would something be so common in speech if it were not useful?
October 26, 2012 at 9:41am.